Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Effito Pte. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. The matters involve 3 examiners and 3 art units, with each case following a separate examination path.
LE, TIEN MINH is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Consistent portfolio terminology can assist coordination, but the assignment pattern supports individualized prosecution responses.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LE, TIEN MINH | 1 | 72.3% | +16.6% |
| WU, YANNA | 1 | 81.0% | +34.1% |
| KOSKY, JUSTIN THOMAS | 1 | — | — |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18879874 | FORKLIFT | LE, TIEN MINH | — |
| 18975269 | HANDLING DEVICE | KOSKY, JUSTIN THOMAS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18879874 | FORKLIFT | LE, TIEN MINH | — |
| 18975190 | HANDLING DEVICE | WU, YANNA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3656 | 1 |
| 2615 | 1 |
| 3655 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18879874 | FORKLIFT | LE, TIEN MINH | 3656 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 30, 2024 |
| 18975190 | HANDLING DEVICE | WU, YANNA | 2615 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 10, 2024 |
| 18975269 | HANDLING DEVICE | KOSKY, JUSTIN THOMAS | 3655 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 10, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEffito Pte. Ltd. has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 3 examiners.
Tien Minh Le has the most, with 1 of Effito Pte. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
