Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eg Biomed Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action within its patent portfolio. This activity is focused in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, representing the company's current technical engagement with the patent office. The matter is situated within 1 distinct art unit.
The pending matter is handled by 1 distinct examiner. KATHERINE D SALMON is the busiest examiner for the company, managing 1 pending office action. This single examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's active office action docket. With 1 pending action and 1 examiner, the company's current prosecution efforts are highly concentrated. This means that the outcome of their biotechnology patenting strategy is currently dependent on the review of Katherine D Salmon. Practitioners should focus on the specific precedents and guidelines relevant to this examiner and the single art unit involved.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SALMON, KATHERINE D | 1 | 42.8% | +37.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18977532 | METHOD FOR EARLY DETECTION, PREDICTION OF TREATMENT RESPONSE AND PROGNOSIS OF LUNG CANCER | SALMON, KATHERINE D | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18977532 | METHOD FOR EARLY DETECTION, PREDICTION OF TREATMENT RESPONSE AND PROGNOSIS OF LUNG CANCER | SALMON, KATHERINE D | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1682 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18977532 | METHOD FOR EARLY DETECTION, PREDICTION OF TREATMENT RESPONSE AND PROGNOSIS OF LUNG CANCER | SALMON, KATHERINE D | 1682 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Dec 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial