Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eggtronic Engineering Spa maintains a focused prosecution profile in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio currently shows 1 pending office action, reflecting a streamlined set of active proceedings at the patent office. This single action is localized within 1 distinct art unit, showing that the company's current filings are not spread across diverse technical classifications. For a practitioner, this indicates that the legal strategy can be narrowly tailored to the specific examination standards of this technical division.
The examiner TA, THO DAC is identified as the busiest examiner for the firm, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner assigned to the portfolio's active matters, the outcome of the company's current prosecution cycle is centralized. This singular focus allows for a dedicated response strategy that accounts for the specific preferences of the 1 distinct examiner involved. The lack of diversification across multiple art units or examiners suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific semiconductor or circuit innovation at this stage of its intellectual property development.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TA, THO DAC | 1 | 86.4% | +15.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18551896 | An AC power appliance inlet | TA, THO DAC | 60d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18551896 | An AC power appliance inlet | TA, THO DAC | 60d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2834 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18551896 | An AC power appliance inlet | TA, THO DAC | 2834 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 60d | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial