Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eindhoven Medical Robotics B V is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This case is assigned to RASHID, MAHBUBUR, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending office action. The company's current prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The presence of 1 pending office action total indicates a very specific focus for the company's current patenting efforts.
Because the portfolio is handled by only 1 distinct examiner, RASHID, MAHBUBUR, the applicant can focus its strategy on the specific requirements of this individual. This concentration within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's innovations in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area are currently being evaluated through a single technical lens. This streamlined environment can lead to more predictable prosecution timelines and a more cohesive patent strategy. Practitioners should note that this centralized approach allows for a more efficient use of resources when responding to USPTO communications. The successful resolution of this single pending matter will be a vital step in securing the company's intellectual property in its chosen technology sector. By focusing on the feedback from a single examiner, the company can ensure its patenting goals are met with precision and technical accuracy.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RASHID, MAHBUBUR | 1 | 67.8% | +20.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18266114 | SAFETY BRAKE SYSTEM FOR ROBOT ARM JOINTS | RASHID, MAHBUBUR | 132d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18266114 | SAFETY BRAKE SYSTEM FOR ROBOT ARM JOINTS | RASHID, MAHBUBUR | 132d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3616 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18266114 | SAFETY BRAKE SYSTEM FOR ROBOT ARM JOINTS | RASHID, MAHBUBUR | 3616 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 132d overdue | Pending | Jun 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial