Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

EKC Technology Inc.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

EKC Technology Inc. currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This workload is distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating a broad spread of examination oversight for the portfolio. Such a distribution suggests that the company's intellectual property is being evaluated across multiple technical niches rather than being concentrated in a single specialized group.

The busiest examiner for this company is NGUYEN, TRI V, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the total of 3 pending actions is split evenly among 3 distinct examiners, no single official holds a majority of the active cases. This lack of concentration means that the company must navigate three different sets of examiner preferences and procedural styles simultaneously, which can complicate the coordination of a unified prosecution strategy.

For practitioners, the presence of 3 distinct art units for only 3 pending actions highlights a high degree of technical diversity in the current filings. Each action represents a unique point of contact at the patent office, requiring tailored responses that account for the specific tendencies of each examiner. The fact that the busiest examiner only handles 1 pending action further emphasizes that there is no central figure to influence the overall direction of the pending portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
NGUYEN, TRI V 1 67.6% +57.2%
UTECH, BENJAMIN L 1 100.0% +0.0%
JACKSON, MONIQUE R 1 34.8% +44.3%
PENNY, TABATHA L 1 45.7% +22.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18422732 FORMATION OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE LAYERS AT NEAR AMBIENT TEMPERATURE USING SILVER NANOPARTICULATE PROCESSING AND INKS FOR FORMING THE LAYERS NGUYEN, TRI V 42d
18387838 COATINGS AND PROCESSING OF TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE FILMS FOR STABILIZATION OF SPARSE METAL CONDUCTIVE LAYERS UTECH, BENJAMIN L —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18238178 STABILIZED SPARSE METAL CONDUCTIVE FILMS AND SOLUTIONS FOR DELIVERY OF STABILIZING COMPOUNDS JACKSON, MONIQUE R 23d overdue
18422732 FORMATION OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE LAYERS AT NEAR AMBIENT TEMPERATURE USING SILVER NANOPARTICULATE PROCESSING AND INKS FOR FORMING THE LAYERS NGUYEN, TRI V 42d
18212297 FORMATION OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE LAYERS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE USING SILVER NANOPARTICULATE PROCESSING AND INKS FOR FORMING THE LAYERS PENNY, TABATHA L 63d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1764 1
1700 1
1787 1
1712 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18422732 FORMATION OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE LAYERS AT NEAR AMBIENT TEMPERATURE USING SILVER NANOPARTICULATE PROCESSING AND INKS FOR FORMING THE LAYERS NGUYEN, TRI V 1764 §103§112 Final Rejection 42d Pending Jan 25, 2024
18387838 COATINGS AND PROCESSING OF TRANSPARENT CONDUCTIVE FILMS FOR STABILIZATION OF SPARSE METAL CONDUCTIVE LAYERS UTECH, BENJAMIN L 1700 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 07, 2023
18238178 STABILIZED SPARSE METAL CONDUCTIVE FILMS AND SOLUTIONS FOR DELIVERY OF STABILIZING COMPOUNDS JACKSON, MONIQUE R 1787 §103 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Aug 25, 2023
18212297 FORMATION OF ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE LAYERS AT ROOM TEMPERATURE USING SILVER NANOPARTICULATE PROCESSING AND INKS FOR FORMING THE LAYERS PENNY, TABATHA L 1712 §103 Non-Final OA 63d Pending Jun 21, 2023

Managing EKC Technology Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does EKC Technology Inc. have?

EKC Technology Inc. has 4 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most EKC Technology Inc. applications?

Tri V Nguyen has the most, with 1 of EKC Technology Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are EKC Technology Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month