Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ekpo Fuel Cell Technologies GmbH

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ekpo Fuel Cell Technologies GmbH is managing 3 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 3 distinct examiners and 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of all actions within a single art unit suggests a focused technical area, even though different examiners are reviewing the individual cases.

MICHAEL PATRICK MALONEY is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. With multiple examiners involved, the workload is split such that no single examiner holds a majority of the company's pending workload. For the applicant, this provides different perspectives from within the same art unit, which can be valuable for understanding the examination trends for their specific fuel cell technologies.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MALONEY, MICHAEL PATRICK 1 — —
ROSA BERRIOS, NICOLAS JENNIEL 1 — —
KLINE, SYDNEY LYNN 1 71.4% +26.7%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18661260 FUEL CELL DEVICE MALONEY, MICHAEL PATRICK —
18610142 FUEL CELL DEVICE HAVING A CASING ROSA BERRIOS, NICOLAS JENNIEL —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18459686 FUEL CELL DEVICE KLINE, SYDNEY LYNN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1729 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18661260 FUEL CELL DEVICE MALONEY, MICHAEL PATRICK — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2024
18610142 FUEL CELL DEVICE HAVING A CASING ROSA BERRIOS, NICOLAS JENNIEL — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 19, 2024
18459686 FUEL CELL DEVICE KLINE, SYDNEY LYNN 1729 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 01, 2023

Managing Ekpo Fuel Cell Technologies GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month