Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Electrochaea GmbH

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Electrochaea GmbH holds a company patent portfolio in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. There are 2 pending office actions currently active. These actions are distributed among a matching number of distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's innovations are being evaluated by multiple technical divisions, requiring a multi-faceted approach to prosecution.

KEELING, ALEXANDER W is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action. This represents a portion of the total pending office actions currently active for the company. Because the workload is split between the examiners, no single individual dominates the current prosecution landscape.

The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's research spans different specialized classifications within the Chemistry & Materials field. With multiple examiners involved, the company must manage separate sets of examiner preferences and interpretations. This requires the company to tailor its legal arguments to different individual perspectives while maintaining consistency across the portfolio. Resolving the issues raised by KEELING, ALEXANDER W is a key step.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KEELING, ALEXANDER W 1 56.0% +37.9%
BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 1 23.8% +56.3%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17904119 BIOCATALYST ADAPTATION AS LOAD FOLLOWING SOLUTION BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 29d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17904119 BIOCATALYST ADAPTATION AS LOAD FOLLOWING SOLUTION BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 29d
18282443 MEC SYSTEM KEELING, ALEXANDER W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1795 1
1657 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18282443 MEC SYSTEM KEELING, ALEXANDER W 1795 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 15, 2023
17904119 BIOCATALYST ADAPTATION AS LOAD FOLLOWING SOLUTION BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 1657 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Aug 12, 2022

Managing Electrochaea GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Electrochaea GmbH have?

Electrochaea GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Electrochaea GmbH applications?

Alexander W Keeling has the most, with 1 of Electrochaea GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Electrochaea GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month