Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Elips Diagnostics Inc. currently manages a focused patent portfolio within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The data shows 1 pending office action, which is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. This concentration suggests a specific prosecution track for the company's current intellectual property efforts, resulting in a low administrative overhead. The alignment of the examiner with 1 distinct art unit simplifies the oversight required for these filings.
Examiner DIGGS, TANISHA is identified as the busiest examiner for this portfolio, handling 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution strategy is centralized. This lack of distribution across multiple art units or examiners indicates that the pending matter falls within a narrow technical niche. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination history of the named examiner to anticipate potential hurdles.
For practitioners, the presence of the pending office action under DIGGS, TANISHA means that the immediate workload is limited to a single point of contact. This allows for a direct approach to prosecution, as the attorney can focus on the preferences of the individual examiner. Future filings in the Chemistry & Materials space may continue this trend of focused examination if the company maintains its current research trajectory. The nature of the pending action ensures that resources are not divided across multiple complex cases.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIGGS, TANISHA | 1 | 55.1% | +54.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18224121 | NOVEL ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE CO-REACTANT, ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE SYSTEM COMPRISING SAME | DIGGS, TANISHA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1798 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18224121 | NOVEL ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE CO-REACTANT, ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION AND ELECTROCHEMILUMINESCENCE SYSTEM COMPRISING SAME | DIGGS, TANISHA | 1798 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 20, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialElips Diagnostics Inc. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Tanisha Diggs has the most, with 1 of Elips Diagnostics Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
