Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Em Sil Enterprises Inc. operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company's current patent portfolio includes 1 pending office action. This action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. Such a configuration shows that the company's current patenting activities are focused on a specific technical niche within the broader mechanical systems sector. Practitioners can see that the prosecution footprint is currently very small and highly contained.
The busiest examiner identified in the data is BLANKENSHIP, GREGORY A, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total pending workload for the company at the USPTO. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the prosecution path is highly centralized. This centralization means that the company's current patent strategy is tied to the decisions of a single individual in a specific administrative division. The outcome of this pending matter will be a primary indicator of the company's success in securing its current intellectual property objectives.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLANKENSHIP, GREGORY A | 1 | 85.1% | +3.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18327260 | Enclosed Rollback Tow Truck Bed and Frame Assembly | BLANKENSHIP, GREGORY A | 154d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3612 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18327260 | Enclosed Rollback Tow Truck Bed and Frame Assembly | BLANKENSHIP, GREGORY A | 3612 | §101§102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | 154d overdue | Pending | Jun 01, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial