Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Em-Tech Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Communications

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Em-Tech Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This single action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, SHAH, ANTIM G. The matter is categorized under 1 distinct art unit, reflecting the specialized nature of the communications sector. This concentration of the 1 pending action within a single art unit reflects a focused technical scope for the company's current filing.

SHAH, ANTIM G is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. Because the company has only 1 pending office action, this examiner is responsible for the entire active prosecution workload. The presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending action indicates that the prosecution is currently focused through a single channel at the patent office. For practitioners, the outcome of this matter depends entirely on the individual review style of SHAH, ANTIM G.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
100% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHAH, ANTIM G 1 74.2% +39.2%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18718671 Sound Amplification Block Made of Air-Permeable Material and Air-Absorbing Material and Having Layered Structure, and Manufacturing Method Thereof SHAH, ANTIM G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2693 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18718671 Sound Amplification Block Made of Air-Permeable Material and Air-Absorbing Material and Having Layered Structure, and Manufacturing Method Thereof SHAH, ANTIM G 2693 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 11, 2024

Managing Em-Tech Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month