Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Emhart Glass SA

Technology area: Networking & Security

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Emhart Glass SA is managing 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. The prosecution is focused within 1 distinct art unit and assigned to 1 distinct examiner. BILLAH, MASUM is the busiest examiner for the company, currently responsible for the 1 pending office action. This represents the current point of contact for the company's active patent prosecution in the Networking & Security sector.

With only 1 pending office action, the company's strategy is concentrated on the specific requirements of 1 distinct examiner. BILLAH, MASUM handles the active workload within the 1 distinct art unit assigned. Practitioners should focus on the examination history of this examiner to navigate the Networking & Security filing effectively. The 1 pending office action indicates a very limited but highly specialized active portfolio at this time.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BILLAH, MASUM 1 80.5% +20.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18821261 Apparatus and Method for Inspecting Containers BILLAH, MASUM 5d overdue

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18821261 Apparatus and Method for Inspecting Containers BILLAH, MASUM 5d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2486 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18821261 Apparatus and Method for Inspecting Containers BILLAH, MASUM 2486 §103 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending Aug 30, 2024

Managing Emhart Glass SA's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month