Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Emrgy Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, which reflects a very concentrated prosecution profile. Such a focused approach is common when a company is pursuing a specific chemical or material technology that fits neatly into 1 technical category at the patent office.
TRINH, THANH TRUC is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action, which is the only active action for the company. With only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company can dedicate its resources to addressing the specific technical concerns raised in this single matter. This direct relationship simplifies the prosecution process, as there are no competing examiner styles or art unit requirements to balance. However, it also means that the company's current progress in the chemistry space is entirely dependent on the resolution of this 1 pending office action with this specific examiner.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRINH, THANH TRUC | 1 | 22.1% | +10.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18635760 | CANAL FLOATING SOLAR AND INSTALLATION PROCESSES FOR SAME | TRINH, THANH TRUC | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18635760 | CANAL FLOATING SOLAR AND INSTALLATION PROCESSES FOR SAME | TRINH, THANH TRUC | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1726 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18635760 | CANAL FLOATING SOLAR AND INSTALLATION PROCESSES FOR SAME | TRINH, THANH TRUC | 1726 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial