Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Endotheia Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Endotheia Inc. is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's prosecution profile currently includes 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, suggesting a highly targeted approach to securing patents in this field. Such a narrow distribution often indicates a very specific technological focus or a nascent stage of portfolio development within the United States patent system.

The busiest examiner for Endotheia Inc. is STARKEY, OLIVIA GRACE, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. The fact that only 1 distinct art unit is involved indicates that the company's active filings fall within a specific technical niche. This concentration means there is no opportunity to compare different examiner behaviors or art unit standards within the company's current workload, requiring a strategy tailored to a single set of expectations.

All strategic decisions must be focused on the 1 distinct art unit, making the outcome of the 1 pending office action a critical indicator of progress. Practitioners should note that STARKEY, OLIVIA GRACE is the sole official determining the immediate trajectory of the portfolio. This streamlined data set reflects a period of focused prosecution activity where the technical nuances of Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering are handled by a single point of contact at the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STARKEY, OLIVIA GRACE 1 70.4% -4.8%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3795 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18082435 Method and Device for Endoscopic Aspiration STARKEY, OLIVIA GRACE 3795 §103 Final Rejection 70d Pending Dec 15, 2022

Managing Endotheia Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month