Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Engenome S R L

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Engenome S R L holds a company patent portfolio in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. There are 2 pending office actions currently active. These actions are distributed among a matching number of distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that the company's innovations are being evaluated by multiple technical divisions, requiring a multi-faceted approach to prosecution.

STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS is the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is currently handling 1 pending office action. This represents a portion of the total pending office actions currently active for the company. Because the workload is split between the examiners, no single individual dominates the current prosecution landscape.

The involvement of 2 distinct art units suggests that the company's research spans different specialized classifications within the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals field. With multiple examiners involved, the company must manage separate sets of examiner preferences and interpretations. This requires the company to tailor its legal arguments to different individual perspectives while maintaining consistency across the portfolio. Resolving the issues raised by STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS is a key step.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS 1 — —
WISE, OLIVIA M. 1 33.9% +29.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18550662 PREDICTIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY OF COMBINATIONS OF DIGENIC OR OLIGOGENIC VARIANTS STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS —
18040604 METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY/BENIGNITY OF A GENOMIC VARIANT IN CONNECTION WITH A GIVEN DISEASE WISE, OLIVIA M. —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18040604 METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY/BENIGNITY OF A GENOMIC VARIANT IN CONNECTION WITH A GIVEN DISEASE WISE, OLIVIA M. —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1686 1
1685 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18550662 PREDICTIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY OF COMBINATIONS OF DIGENIC OR OLIGOGENIC VARIANTS STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS 1686 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 14, 2023
18040604 METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY/BENIGNITY OF A GENOMIC VARIANT IN CONNECTION WITH A GIVEN DISEASE WISE, OLIVIA M. 1685 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2023

Managing Engenome S R L's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Engenome S R L have?

Engenome S R L has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Engenome S R L applications?

John Thomas Stubbs has the most, with 1 of Engenome S R L's pending office actions.

What technology area are Engenome S R L's patent applications in?

Mostly Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals (USPTO Tech Center 1600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month