Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Engenome S R L has 2 pending office actions. These actions are being reviewed by 2 distinct examiners. The portfolio currently shows 0 distinct art units, which indicates the administrative categorization for these pending matters. STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action. This examiner handles one of the 2 pending office actions currently active. The use of 2 distinct examiners suggests that the workload for the company's pending applications is distributed between different personnel at the patent office, requiring the practitioner to manage two separate examiner relationships.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS | 1 | — | — |
| WISE, OLIVIA M. | 1 | 33.9% | +29.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18550662 | PREDICTIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY OF COMBINATIONS OF DIGENIC OR OLIGOGENIC VARIANTS | STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS | — |
| 18040604 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY/BENIGNITY OF A GENOMIC VARIANT IN CONNECTION WITH A GIVEN DISEASE | WISE, OLIVIA M. | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18040604 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY/BENIGNITY OF A GENOMIC VARIANT IN CONNECTION WITH A GIVEN DISEASE | WISE, OLIVIA M. | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18550662 | PREDICTIVE METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY OF COMBINATIONS OF DIGENIC OR OLIGOGENIC VARIANTS | STUBBS, JOHN THOMAS | — | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 14, 2023 |
| 18040604 | METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE PATHOGENICITY/BENIGNITY OF A GENOMIC VARIANT IN CONNECTION WITH A GIVEN DISEASE | WISE, OLIVIA M. | — | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 03, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial