Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 7 patents granted in the last 365 days
Enpulse Co. Ltd. has 6 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters involve 5 examiners and 5 art units, indicating that the docket is distributed across several examination channels with a corresponding spread of art-unit assignments.
VO, HAI is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending matters. That concentration identifies one examiner relationship for closer coordination, while the remaining actions require separate prosecution planning. The distinct art-unit assignments support reviewing claim treatment and technical evidence by examination context rather than assuming one uniform approach.
Counsel should preserve consistency in the description of the materials technology while tailoring amendments, prior-art arguments, and interview preparation to each assigned examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (17%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 5 (83%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| VO, HAI | 2 | 57.1% | +72.5% |
| GOLOBOY, JAMES C | 1 | 63.7% | +8.7% |
| HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | 1 | 68.0% | +43.4% |
| CASE, SARAH CATHERINE | 1 | 41.1% | +50.8% |
| NGUYEN, DUSTIN T | 1 | 72.6% | +17.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18884117 | POLISHING PAD WITH EXCELLENT RECYCLABILITY AND PYROLYSIS OIL OBTAINED THEREFROM | GOLOBOY, JAMES C | 8d overdue |
| 18590378 | POLISHING PAD AND PREPARING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | 13d |
| 18538695 | POLISHING PAD AND METHOD OF MONITORING A POLISHING PROCESS USING THE SAME | NGUYEN, DUSTIN T | 61d |
| 18882756 | POLISHING PAD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAME | VO, HAI | — |
| 18581387 | POLISHING PAD AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF | CASE, SARAH CATHERINE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18590378 | POLISHING PAD AND PREPARING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | 13d |
| 18538695 | POLISHING PAD AND METHOD OF MONITORING A POLISHING PROCESS USING THE SAME | NGUYEN, DUSTIN T | 61d |
| 18882756 | POLISHING PAD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAME | VO, HAI | — |
| 18609288 | POLISHING PAD WITH ADJUSTED CONTENT OF CHLORINE AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAME | VO, HAI | — |
| 18581387 | POLISHING PAD AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF | CASE, SARAH CATHERINE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3723 | 2 |
| 1771 | 1 |
| 1788 | 1 |
| 1731 | 1 |
| 3745 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18884117 | POLISHING PAD WITH EXCELLENT RECYCLABILITY AND PYROLYSIS OIL OBTAINED THEREFROM | GOLOBOY, JAMES C | 1771 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Sep 13, 2024 |
| 18882756 | POLISHING PAD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAME | VO, HAI | 1788 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 12, 2024 |
| 18609288 | POLISHING PAD WITH ADJUSTED CONTENT OF CHLORINE AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE USING THE SAME | VO, HAI | 3723 | §102§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 19, 2024 |
| 18590378 | POLISHING PAD AND PREPARING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE | HAWKINS, JASON KHALIL | 3723 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Feb 28, 2024 |
| 18581387 | POLISHING PAD AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF | CASE, SARAH CATHERINE | 1731 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 20, 2024 |
| 18538695 | POLISHING PAD AND METHOD OF MONITORING A POLISHING PROCESS USING THE SAME | NGUYEN, DUSTIN T | 3745 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 61d | Pending | Dec 13, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEnpulse Co. Ltd. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.
Hai Vo has the most, with 2 of Enpulse Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
