Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Enterprise Electronics LLC currently manages 1 pending office action within the Communications technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a concentrated prosecution focus for the current portfolio. The presence of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's active Communications filings are currently localized within a specific technical niche at the patent office.
The prosecution of this portfolio is handled by PHAM, QUANG, who is identified as the busiest examiner. This individual is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action, which represents the totality of the company's current pending office actions. Because all active work is consolidated under one examiner and one art unit, the company's immediate success in the Communications sector depends on the specific examination patterns of this single official. Practitioners should focus on the examiner's past history to predict the outcome of this lone 1 pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHAM, QUANG | 1 | 54.2% | +57.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19011139 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SECURING KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM AGAINST RELAY ATTACK | PHAM, QUANG | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2685 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19011139 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR SECURING KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM AGAINST RELAY ATTACK | PHAM, QUANG | 2685 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jan 06, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial