Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Envgo Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, POLAY, ANDREW, who also serves as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. The presence of a distinct art unit suggests that the company's current prosecution is localized within a single technical division. This concentration means that the company's active interaction with the patent office is highly focused.
The examiner POLAY, ANDREW holds the entirety of the company's pending workload. This arrangement within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area means that the applicant's current results depend on the specific examination style of a single official. The 1 pending office action represents the company's immediate prosecution goal, and the outcome will be determined by this specific point of contact. Practitioners should focus on the requirements of the single active matter to understand the company's progress.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| POLAY, ANDREW | 1 | 74.0% | +20.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18488106 | ELECTRIC-POWERED BOAT WITH RETRACTABLE HYDROFOIL | POLAY, ANDREW | 8d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18488106 | ELECTRIC-POWERED BOAT WITH RETRACTABLE HYDROFOIL | POLAY, ANDREW | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18488106 | ELECTRIC-POWERED BOAT WITH RETRACTABLE HYDROFOIL | POLAY, ANDREW | 3615 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Oct 17, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial