Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Envision Aesc Energy Devices Ltd. currently maintains 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. MATTHEW T MARTIN is the busiest examiner, managing the 1 pending office action. The company's active prosecution is currently limited to this single examiner and art unit.
The 1 pending office action defines the current scale of the company's prosecution activity. Because the work is localized in the Chemistry & Materials technology area, the company's efforts are focused on a single technical field. MATTHEW T MARTIN, as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, handles all active matters for the portfolio. This 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit structure allows the company to avoid the complexity of managing multiple prosecution styles or differing art unit practices across its current applications.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTIN, MATTHEW T | 1 | 44.7% | +38.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18358305 | SECONDARY BATTERY | MARTIN, MATTHEW T | 4d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18358305 | SECONDARY BATTERY | MARTIN, MATTHEW T | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1728 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18358305 | SECONDARY BATTERY | MARTIN, MATTHEW T | 1728 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 4d overdue | Pending | Jul 25, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEnvision Aesc Energy Devices Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Matthew T Martin has the most, with 1 of Envision Aesc Energy Devices Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
