Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
6 pending office actions • 6 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Envision Aesc Japan Ltd. has 6 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters are spread across 6 examiners and 6 art units, so the portfolio presents broad examination distribution rather than a single coordinated channel.
COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Because the busiest-examiner figure does not represent the full pending workload, portfolio management should track each application separately and identify recurring claim, prior-art, or disclosure issues across the different art units.
The distribution makes centralized prosecution controls important. A shared claim-position record can reduce inconsistent amendments, while examiner-specific response planning remains necessary for the separate examination settings.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD | 1 | 75.4% | +32.4% |
| D'ANIELLO, NICHOLAS P | 1 | 68.3% | +41.7% |
| HARRIS, MARY GRACE | 1 | 69.3% | +29.1% |
| RASSOULI, LILI | 1 | 60.0% | +66.7% |
| MARTIN, ANGELA J | 1 | 67.3% | -31.4% |
| GARCIA, BETHANY CLAIRE | 1 | 66.7% | +34.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18329090 | TEMPERATURE SENSOR DEVICE AND BATTERY MODULE | HARRIS, MARY GRACE | 4d overdue |
| 18318923 | BATTERY MODULE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BATTERY MODULE | RASSOULI, LILI | 35d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18329090 | TEMPERATURE SENSOR DEVICE AND BATTERY MODULE | HARRIS, MARY GRACE | 4d overdue |
| 17782130 | POSITIVE ELECTRODE, LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING POSITIVE ELECTRODE SHEET | GARCIA, BETHANY CLAIRE | 27d |
| 18261153 | BATTERY MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BATTERY MODULE | COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD | 34d |
| 18318923 | BATTERY MODULE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BATTERY MODULE | RASSOULI, LILI | 35d |
| 18260355 | BATTERY MODULE | D'ANIELLO, NICHOLAS P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1752 | 1 |
| 1723 | 1 |
| 1729 | 1 |
| 1728 | 1 |
| 1727 | 1 |
| 1721 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18261153 | BATTERY MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BATTERY MODULE | COCHENOUR, ZACKARY RICHARD | 1752 | §103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Jul 12, 2023 |
| 18260355 | BATTERY MODULE | D'ANIELLO, NICHOLAS P | 1723 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 05, 2023 |
| 18329090 | TEMPERATURE SENSOR DEVICE AND BATTERY MODULE | HARRIS, MARY GRACE | 1729 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Jun 05, 2023 |
| 18318923 | BATTERY MODULE, AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING BATTERY MODULE | RASSOULI, LILI | 1728 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 35d | Pending | May 17, 2023 |
| 17759920 | BATTERY AND METHOD OF PRODUCING BATTERY | MARTIN, ANGELA J | 1727 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 01, 2022 |
| 17782130 | POSITIVE ELECTRODE, LITHIUM ION SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING POSITIVE ELECTRODE SHEET | GARCIA, BETHANY CLAIRE | 1721 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Jun 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEnvision Aesc Japan Ltd. has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 6 examiners.
Zackary Richard Cochenour has the most, with 1 of Envision Aesc Japan Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
