Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Epigenica AB

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Epigenica AB is currently managing 1 pending office action. This case is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE, who holds the pending office action for the company. The prosecution is recorded as having 0 distinct art units. Because of this pending action, the company's immediate patent strategy is focused on the specific feedback and examination criteria of this examiner. The busiest examiner, LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE, is the primary point of contact for the 1 pending action. This narrow interaction allows for a focused strategy when addressing the outstanding office action.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE 1 62.5% +45.4%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18253517 MULTIPLEXED METHOD FOR ASSESSING GLOBAL OR GENOMIC LOCUS-SPECIFIC LEVELS OF CHROMATIN MODIFICATION LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18253517 MULTIPLEXED METHOD FOR ASSESSING GLOBAL OR GENOMIC LOCUS-SPECIFIC LEVELS OF CHROMATIN MODIFICATION LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18253517 MULTIPLEXED METHOD FOR ASSESSING GLOBAL OR GENOMIC LOCUS-SPECIFIC LEVELS OF CHROMATIN MODIFICATION LAFAVE, ELIZABETH ROSE — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 30, 2023

Managing Epigenica AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month