Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Eppendorf SE

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Eppendorf SE has 6 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters involve 6 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, showing broad distribution across the examination workforce while retaining some art-unit concentration.

LAU, TUNG S is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Because the pending matters span multiple examiners and art units, prosecution planning should preserve a common portfolio position without assuming that one response approach will fit every application.

The distribution also supports examiner-specific review of claim construction, cited technology, and amendment practice. The art-unit pattern may help identify recurring technical themes, while the examiner assignments remain important for response timing and argument selection.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (50%)
§103 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
67% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
17% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAU, TUNG S 1 83.0% +14.5%
WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL 1 58.0% +48.4%
COVINGTON, AMANDA R 1 21.5% +28.1%
HASSAN, LIBAN M 1 50.8% +31.1%
WHATLEY, BENJAMIN R 1 66.7% +68.3%
GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY 1 67.6% +52.2%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18702228 PIPETTE CALIBRATION MANAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD LAU, TUNG S —
18261961 HAND-HELD PIPETTING DEVICE WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL —
18557017 SYSTEM INCLUDING HAND-HELD PIPETTING DEVICE COVINGTON, AMANDA R —
18262150 INCUBATOR AND METHOD HASSAN, LIBAN M —
18245251 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING LABWARE WHATLEY, BENJAMIN R —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18702228 PIPETTE CALIBRATION MANAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD LAU, TUNG S —
18261961 HAND-HELD PIPETTING DEVICE WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL —
18557017 SYSTEM INCLUDING HAND-HELD PIPETTING DEVICE COVINGTON, AMANDA R —
18262150 INCUBATOR AND METHOD HASSAN, LIBAN M —
18245251 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING LABWARE WHATLEY, BENJAMIN R —
17046230 LABORATORY TEMPERATURE CONTROL DEVICES GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1798 2
2857 1
1758 1
3686 1
1799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18702228 PIPETTE CALIBRATION MANAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD LAU, TUNG S 2857 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 17, 2024
18261961 HAND-HELD PIPETTING DEVICE WHITE, DENNIS MICHAEL 1758 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 31, 2024
18557017 SYSTEM INCLUDING HAND-HELD PIPETTING DEVICE COVINGTON, AMANDA R 3686 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 24, 2023
18262150 INCUBATOR AND METHOD HASSAN, LIBAN M 1799 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2023
18245251 METHOD AND DEVICE FOR IDENTIFYING LABWARE WHATLEY, BENJAMIN R 1798 §101§102§103Other Final Rejection — Pending Mar 14, 2023
17046230 LABORATORY TEMPERATURE CONTROL DEVICES GZYBOWSKI, MICHAEL STANLEY 1798 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 22, 2020

Managing Eppendorf SE's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Eppendorf SE have?

Eppendorf SE has 6 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 6 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Eppendorf SE applications?

Tung S Lau has the most, with 1 of Eppendorf SE's pending office actions.

What technology area are Eppendorf SE's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month