Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 3 (75%) |
| §112 only | 1 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALLEY, MARY S | 1 | 95.0% | +5.2% |
| DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH | 1 | 61.5% | +30.0% |
| FISHER, BRITTANY I | 1 | 84.4% | +12.2% |
| HURST, JONATHAN M | 1 | 53.0% | +18.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35523521 | Cell culture incubator | MALLEY, MARY S | 77d overdue |
| 17703007 | PIPETTE TIP | FISHER, BRITTANY I | 27d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18245274 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A VALUE OF A CAMERA PARAMETER | DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH | 42d overdue |
| 17626174 | MULTI-CONNECTOR PORT | HURST, JONATHAN M | 5d |
| 17703007 | PIPETTE TIP | FISHER, BRITTANY I | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2943 | 1 |
| 2677 | 1 |
| 1796 | 1 |
| 1799 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35523521 | Cell culture incubator | MALLEY, MARY S | 2943 | §112 | Non-Final OA | 77d overdue | Pending | Jan 10, 2024 |
| 18245274 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING A VALUE OF A CAMERA PARAMETER | DRYDEN, EMMA ELIZABETH | 2677 | §103 | Final Rejection | 42d overdue | Pending | Mar 14, 2023 |
| 17703007 | PIPETTE TIP | FISHER, BRITTANY I | 1796 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Mar 24, 2022 |
| 17626174 | MULTI-CONNECTOR PORT | HURST, JONATHAN M | 1799 | §103 | Final Rejection | 5d | Pending | Jan 11, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial