Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Epr Excavate LLC

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Epr Excavate LLC is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's patent prosecution profile currently features 1 pending office action. This 1 pending office action indicates a highly concentrated prosecution effort for the company's current filings at the USPTO.

The prosecution activity is situated within 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is BERRY, SAMANTHA MARIE, who is currently managing 1 pending office action. This concentration within 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technical scope of the pending matter is focused within a specific area of Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering.

For practitioners, having 1 distinct examiner and 1 pending office action means that the prosecution strategy is entirely focused on a single set of examiner requirements. The role of BERRY, SAMANTHA MARIE is central to the company's current USPTO engagement. This focused approach allows for a more efficient response to the 1 pending office action without the need to manage varying examiner styles across the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BERRY, SAMANTHA MARIE 1 50.0% +0.0%

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3711 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18385138 Amusement Activity Station BERRY, SAMANTHA MARIE 3711 §103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Oct 30, 2023

Managing Epr Excavate LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month