Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Equinor Energy AS

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Equinor Energy AS has 8 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are handled by 7 distinct examiners, indicating a high level of individual attention for each case. Only one examiner is handling more than a single action for this portfolio.

The workload is spread across 6 distinct art units, showing a diverse range of mechanical and transportation technologies. Fiorello, Benjamin F is the busiest examiner, with 2 pending actions under review. This means Fiorello is the only examiner managing more than one of the 8 pending office actions currently active for the company.

With 7 distinct examiners and 6 distinct art units, the portfolio is moderately distributed. The concentration of 2 actions with Fiorello, Benjamin F provides a small point of focus, but the other 6 actions are each managed by different examiners. Practitioners should note that the 8 pending office actions will likely follow 7 different prosecution trajectories based on examiner variability.

The strategy for Equinor Energy AS should involve a detailed review of the 6 distinct art units. Since Fiorello, Benjamin F handles 2 pending actions, their specific history is slightly more influential than the other examiners. However, the legal team must still prepare unique arguments for the remaining 6 actions to ensure success across the entire portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
88% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F 2 73.9% +7.5%
RHODES-VIVOUR, TEMILADE S 1 88.7% +7.6%
CHRISTENSEN, DANIELLE M 1 79.4% +11.3%
MARONEY, JENNA M 1 64.6% +20.1%
ANDRISH, SEAN D 1 71.5% +32.2%
WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN 1 84.1% +11.7%
ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 1 46.9% +31.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18881615 SENSING WITHIN A SUBSEA ELECTRIC ARCHITECTURE IN A WIND FARM RHODES-VIVOUR, TEMILADE S —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18292592 SUBSEA CABLE BUNDLE INSTALLATION ANDRISH, SEAN D 14d
18014575 RESERVOIR FLUID PROPERTY ESTIMATION USING MUD-GAS DATA WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN 14d
18884884 SUBSEA FOUNDATION FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F 35d
18884916 SUBSEA FOUNDATION FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F 42d
18845533 A METHOD OF STORING ETHANE MARONEY, JENNA M —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18865203 CONTROLLING DIFFUSION OF A WAKE GENERATED BY A WIND TURBINE CHRISTENSEN, DANIELLE M 9d overdue
17609620 SYSTEM FOR ACQUIRING SEISMIC DATA ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 1d overdue
18292592 SUBSEA CABLE BUNDLE INSTALLATION ANDRISH, SEAN D 14d
18014575 RESERVOIR FLUID PROPERTY ESTIMATION USING MUD-GAS DATA WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN 14d
18845533 A METHOD OF STORING ETHANE MARONEY, JENNA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3678 3
2858 1
3745 1
3763 1
3672 1
3645 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18881615 SENSING WITHIN A SUBSEA ELECTRIC ARCHITECTURE IN A WIND FARM RHODES-VIVOUR, TEMILADE S 2858 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 06, 2025
18865203 CONTROLLING DIFFUSION OF A WAKE GENERATED BY A WIND TURBINE CHRISTENSEN, DANIELLE M 3745 §103 Non-Final OA 9d overdue Pending Nov 12, 2024
18884884 SUBSEA FOUNDATION FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F 3678 §102§103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Sep 13, 2024
18884916 SUBSEA FOUNDATION FIORELLO, BENJAMIN F 3678 §102§103Other Final Rejection 42d Pending Sep 13, 2024
18845533 A METHOD OF STORING ETHANE MARONEY, JENNA M 3763 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 10, 2024
18292592 SUBSEA CABLE BUNDLE INSTALLATION ANDRISH, SEAN D 3678 §103§112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jan 26, 2024
18014575 RESERVOIR FLUID PROPERTY ESTIMATION USING MUD-GAS DATA WLODARSKI, NICHOLAS NMN 3672 §101§102 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 05, 2023
17609620 SYSTEM FOR ACQUIRING SEISMIC DATA ATMAKURI, VIKAS NMN 3645 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Nov 08, 2021

Managing Equinor Energy AS's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Equinor Energy AS have?

Equinor Energy AS has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Equinor Energy AS applications?

Benjamin F Fiorello has the most, with 2 of Equinor Energy AS's pending office actions.

What technology area are Equinor Energy AS's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month