Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Equipx LLC operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with a focused prosecution profile. The company currently has 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. This examiner, CHOY, PAN G, is responsible for the 1 busiest examiner pending action, representing the total active workload for the portfolio.
The prosecution is confined to 1 distinct art unit, suggesting a specific technical niche within the broader Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Because there is only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, the company's current legal efforts are concentrated on a single point of contact. This lack of examiner or art unit diversity means that the outcome of this case will define the company's immediate success in this technology area.
For a practitioner, the presence of only 1 distinct art unit simplifies the management of the portfolio. The focus remains on the 1 busiest examiner pending action assigned to CHOY, PAN G, making the prosecution strategy straightforward and targeted. This centralized structure ensures that resources are not divided across multiple conflicting examiner preferences.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOY, PAN G | 1 | 24.4% | +34.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18936843 | METHOD OF ESTABLISHING A DECISION SUPPORT ENGINE FOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | CHOY, PAN G | 9d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18936843 | METHOD OF ESTABLISHING A DECISION SUPPORT ENGINE FOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | CHOY, PAN G | 9d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18936843 | METHOD OF ESTABLISHING A DECISION SUPPORT ENGINE FOR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT | CHOY, PAN G | 3624 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 9d overdue | Pending | Nov 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial