Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 1 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (80%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYRD, BRIGID K | 1 | 70.6% | +50.2% |
| SCHERBEL, TODD J | 1 | 76.2% | +51.6% |
| BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE | 1 | 48.3% | +41.6% |
| NEMER, OSAMA MOHAMMAD | 1 | 64.9% | +53.8% |
| HOLLM, JONATHAN ADAM | 1 | 49.1% | +54.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17826454 | CURVED SUTURE NEEDLE EXTENSION | BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE | 131d overdue |
| 17471017 | TAPERED TRANSITION PORTION FOR SUTURE NEEDLES | HOLLM, JONATHAN ADAM | 112d overdue |
| 17877126 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUTURING | SCHERBEL, TODD J | 66d overdue |
| 17470967 | CURVED SUTURE NEEDLES HAVING A NON-SMOOTH PROFILE | NEMER, OSAMA MOHAMMAD | 50d overdue |
| 17945812 | SUTURE NEEDLES WITH FLEXIBLE AND NON-FLEXIBLE COMPONENTS | BYRD, BRIGID K | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3771 | 5 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17945812 | SUTURE NEEDLES WITH FLEXIBLE AND NON-FLEXIBLE COMPONENTS | BYRD, BRIGID K | 3771 | §103 | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Sep 15, 2022 |
| 17877126 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUTURING | SCHERBEL, TODD J | 3771 | §103 | Final Rejection | 66d overdue | Pending | Jul 29, 2022 |
| 17826454 | CURVED SUTURE NEEDLE EXTENSION | BACHMAN, LINDSEY MICHELE | 3771 | §112 | Final Rejection | 131d overdue | Pending | May 27, 2022 |
| 17470967 | CURVED SUTURE NEEDLES HAVING A NON-SMOOTH PROFILE | NEMER, OSAMA MOHAMMAD | 3771 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 50d overdue | Pending | Sep 09, 2021 |
| 17471017 | TAPERED TRANSITION PORTION FOR SUTURE NEEDLES | HOLLM, JONATHAN ADAM | 3771 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 112d overdue | Pending | Sep 09, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial