Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Eupnoos Ltd.

1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Eupnoos Ltd. has 1 pending office action currently under review. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, showing a singular point of contact for the company's current patent office activity. This focused approach means that the company's immediate intellectual property success is tied to the resolution of this pending matter.

The busiest examiner is HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. This individual is responsible for the full pending workload. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy must be tailored specifically to the examination history and tendencies of this examiner, as there are no other active cases to balance the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
100% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN 1 56.5% +39.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18872484 LUNG FUNCTION TESTING HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18872484 LUNG FUNCTION TESTING HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN —

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18872484 LUNG FUNCTION TESTING HOEKSTRA, JEFFREY GERBEN — §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2024

Managing Eupnoos Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month