Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Ever Fortune AI Co. Ltd. is managing 1 pending office action. This matter is categorized under the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution is handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. Andrew Eldridge Lee is the busiest examiner for the company, currently overseeing 1 pending action.
With 1 pending office action, the company's current interaction with the patent office is highly specific. The focus on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area through 1 distinct art unit indicates a targeted technical application. Practitioners can concentrate their strategy on the specific requirements of Andrew Eldridge Lee. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the success of the company's current portfolio depends entirely on this single matter. The use of 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company is not currently pursuing a broad range of technical categories within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | 1 | 16.8% | +31.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19030488 | EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY DOSE PREDICTION SYSTEM THROUGH LATENT DIFFUSION MODEL | LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | 23d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19030488 | EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY DOSE PREDICTION SYSTEM THROUGH LATENT DIFFUSION MODEL | LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | 23d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3684 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19030488 | EXTERNAL BEAM RADIATION THERAPY DOSE PREDICTION SYSTEM THROUGH LATENT DIFFUSION MODEL | LEE, ANDREW ELDRIDGE | 3684 | §101§102§103 | Final Rejection | 23d | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial