Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Ever Viva Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Ever Viva Corporation has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO. The prosecution is focused within a specialized art unit, reflecting a concentrated effort on a specific mechanical application.

DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. With only one examiner and one art unit involved, the prosecution process is highly centralized. This allows the company to focus its resources on the specific requirements and examination style of a single individual at the USPTO.

This alignment of the pending action, examiner, and art unit creates a highly localized prosecution environment. Practitioners can focus their efforts entirely on the specific preferences and history of the assigned examiner within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. This lack of complexity allows for a direct and dedicated response to any issues raised during the examination process, simplifying the management of their intellectual property.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO 1 52.9% +48.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19078561 Elliptical Machine DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19078561 Elliptical Machine DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3784 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19078561 Elliptical Machine DICUIA, JONATHAN ANGELO 3784 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 13, 2025

Managing Ever Viva Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month