Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Everi Technology Pty Ltd. is currently navigating 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit. The presence of only 1 distinct examiner indicates a highly concentrated interaction with the patent office. This 1 distinct art unit serves as the sole administrative point for the company's active matters.
HARPER, TRAMAR YONG serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. This examiner accounts for the total volume of 1 pending action across the company's active filings. The singular focus on 1 examiner within 1 art unit suggests that the outcome of current prosecution relies on a very specific set of examiner perspectives.
Practitioners should tailor their approach to the specific review style of HARPER, TRAMAR YONG. Since the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area is the only technology sector involved, the company can focus its resources on the requirements of this 1 distinct examiner. The 1 pending office action represents the entirety of the company's current prosecution effort.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARPER, TRAMAR YONG | 1 | 65.5% | +23.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18643623 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING PATRON GAMING TICKET REDEMPTION | HARPER, TRAMAR YONG | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18643623 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING PATRON GAMING TICKET REDEMPTION | HARPER, TRAMAR YONG | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18643623 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRACKING PATRON GAMING TICKET REDEMPTION | HARPER, TRAMAR YONG | 3715 | §101§103 | Final Rejection | 9d | Pending | Apr 23, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial