Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Evision Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in its current portfolio. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The data reports 0 distinct art units for this portfolio, indicating a focused administrative presence for the company's active prosecution. Having 0 distinct art units means the matter is not currently spread across different technical groups at the USPTO.
PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA is the busiest examiner for this applicant, handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending office action represents the total volume of pending actions for the company. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct examiner, making the outcome of this single action the primary focus for the applicant's current patent strategy. Practitioners should note that PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA is the sole individual reviewing the company's current filings.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA | 1 | 81.6% | +21.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19031450 | IMAGE CALIBRATION METHOD, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19031450 | IMAGE CALIBRATION METHOD, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2669 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19031450 | IMAGE CALIBRATION METHOD, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | PEDAPATI, CHANDHANA | 2669 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEvision Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Chandhana Pedapati has the most, with 1 of Evision Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.