Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Evity Technologies Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, DIVESH PATEL, and is situated within 1 distinct art unit. DIVESH PATEL is the busiest examiner for the company, currently managing 1 pending office action, which represents the totality of the company's pending matters.
Because there is only 1 pending office action, the prosecution profile is highly centralized. The company's efforts in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area are currently focused on this matter handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. This lack of multiple pending actions means that the company's immediate patenting success in this technology area is tied to the specific review of DIVESH PATEL. The focus on a single technical group confirms that the current prosecution is not diversified across different units at the patent office.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATEL, DIVESH | 1 | 53.2% | +41.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19177062 | INCENTIVIZATION SYSTEMS FOR CURATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | PATEL, DIVESH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19177062 | INCENTIVIZATION SYSTEMS FOR CURATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | PATEL, DIVESH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3696 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19177062 | INCENTIVIZATION SYSTEMS FOR CURATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS | PATEL, DIVESH | 3696 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 11, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial