Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 1 of 1 (100%) have an AI response strategy ready
Evixar Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. Prosecution is currently distributed across 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit. SHARMA, NEERAJ is identified as the busiest examiner, overseeing the pending office action. The portfolio shows a highly centralized prosecution profile with all activity focused under a single examiner.
The 1 pending office action is located within the Communications technology area. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner and a distinct art unit involved, the company's current patenting strategy is concentrated in a single point of contact at the USPTO. SHARMA, NEERAJ is the sole examiner managing the case. This means that the success of the current application relies on addressing the specific concerns of this individual. Practitioners should analyze the examiner's history within the art unit to better anticipate potential hurdles during the prosecution of this matter.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHARMA, NEERAJ | 1 | 84.7% | +12.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18710998 | DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | SHARMA, NEERAJ | 50d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18710998 | DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | SHARMA, NEERAJ | 50d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2659 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18710998 | DETERMINATION SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD, AND PROGRAM | SHARMA, NEERAJ | 2659 | §103 | Final Rejection | 50d overdue | AI Ready | May 16, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial