Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Evolution Optiks Limited

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Evolution Optiks Limited is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, currently managing 2 pending office actions. This indicates a multi-track prosecution effort at the USPTO. The portfolio is spread across 2 distinct art units, suggesting that the company's optical or medical technologies fall into different classification categories. This variety in art units means the company must be prepared for different levels of scrutiny and different sets of prior art references.

The prosecution is being handled by 2 distinct examiners, which requires the company to navigate different examiner styles and requirements. HENSON, DEVIN B is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action under their review. This means the other pending action is assigned to a different examiner, distributing the company's legal focus and reducing the impact of any single examiner's decision on the overall portfolio.

The presence of 2 distinct art units and 2 distinct examiners suggests a diversified approach to patenting within the medical device field. With 1 busiest examiner pending action, the company is not currently facing a concentration of work with any single examiner, which may provide a more varied set of outcomes for its pending applications. This structure allows the company to test different technical arguments across multiple points of contact at the patent office.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
50% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HENSON, DEVIN B 1 65.0% +43.6%
DINH, JACK 1 85.0% +6.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18548857 VISION-BASED COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT TESTING DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD HENSON, DEVIN B 142d overdue
17594699 CORRECTIVE LIGHT FIELD DISPLAY PROFILE MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATION AND INTEGRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD DINH, JACK —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18548857 VISION-BASED COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT TESTING DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD HENSON, DEVIN B 142d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 1
2872 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18548857 VISION-BASED COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT TESTING DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD HENSON, DEVIN B 3791 §102§103 Non-Final OA 142d overdue Pending Sep 01, 2023
17594699 CORRECTIVE LIGHT FIELD DISPLAY PROFILE MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATION AND INTEGRATION SYSTEM AND METHOD DINH, JACK 2872 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 26, 2021

Managing Evolution Optiks Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month