Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Ewald Dörken AG

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA 1 53.9% +28.2%
OLADAPO, TAIWO 1 53.0% +11.3%
GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1 63.5% +8.8%
PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1 28.6% +27.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17796111 CONSTRUCTION FOIL PIZIALI, ANDREW T 125d overdue

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17796111 CONSTRUCTION FOIL PIZIALI, ANDREW T 125d overdue
18458562 AQUEOUS COATING COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOF OLADAPO, TAIWO 46d
18549531 INSULATING AND CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS BASED ON RENEWABLE MATERIALS PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA 62d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1771 2
1783 1
1789 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18549531 INSULATING AND CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS BASED ON RENEWABLE MATERIALS PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA 1783 §103 Non-Final OA 62d Pending Sep 07, 2023
18458562 AQUEOUS COATING COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOF OLADAPO, TAIWO 1771 §103 Non-Final OA 46d Pending Aug 30, 2023
18458547 AQUEOUS COATING COMPOSITION AND USE THEREOF GOLOBOY, JAMES C 1771 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Aug 30, 2023
17796111 CONSTRUCTION FOIL PIZIALI, ANDREW T 1789 §103 Non-Final OA 125d overdue Pending Jul 28, 2022

Managing Ewald Dörken AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month