Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ex Corporation OY has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. The portfolio's current activity is highly focused, with all pending matters concentrated in a single administrative channel at the patent office.
ROGERS, ADAM D is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This represents the total pending workload for the entity at this time. Because there is only 1 pending office action, the company's immediate prosecution success depends entirely on the interaction with this 1 examiner. The lack of multiple examiners means there are no competing priorities within the portfolio.
The presence of 1 distinct art unit confirms that the technical review is limited to a specific group at the patent office. This concentration simplifies the management of the portfolio, as there are no different examiner preferences to balance across the 1 pending office action. The 1 pending office action serves as the primary focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts, requiring a targeted response to examiner ROGERS, ADAM D.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROGERS, ADAM D | 1 | 82.1% | +22.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19014695 | A PAINTBALL LOADER | ROGERS, ADAM D | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19014695 | A PAINTBALL LOADER | ROGERS, ADAM D | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3617 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19014695 | A PAINTBALL LOADER | ROGERS, ADAM D | 3617 | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 09, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial