Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Expedia Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

8 pending office actions • 6 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Expedia Inc. currently has 7 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 7 actions are assigned to 7 distinct examiners, meaning that every pending application is being reviewed by a different person. The portfolio is also distributed across 5 distinct art units, showing a high degree of technical variety for a relatively small number of active cases.

MACASIANO, MARILYN G is identified as the busiest examiner, but she is currently managing only 1 pending office action. Because there are 7 pending office actions and 7 distinct examiners, every examiner involved holds an equal portion of the company's active prosecution workload. This complete lack of examiner concentration means that the company must navigate 7 different individual examination styles simultaneously without any overlap.

The 5 distinct art units involved for these 7 pending office actions indicate that the company's innovations are being evaluated by several different specialized divisions. Practitioners cannot rely on a single examiner's precedent, as MACASIANO, MARILYN G and the other examiners each bring their own perspectives to the actions. This spread across 5 distinct art units requires a versatile approach to patent prosecution within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (75%)
1
Medium (12%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (38%)
§101 + other2 (25%)
§103 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
1
Communications
12% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE 1 68.7% +22.9%
MACASIANO, MARILYN G 1 57.7% +17.1%
GOLDSCHMIDT, CRAIG S 1 73.9% +31.5%
WEINER, ARIELLE E 1 43.4% +53.6%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 1 45.5% +27.0%
VOGT, JACOB BUI 1 42.9% +76.0%
KIM, PATRICK 1 26.3% +33.2%
MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A 1 48.5% +50.2%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18737796 CENTROID-BASED MACHINE LEARNING ITEM RANKING WITHIN AN EMBEDDING SPACE KANG, TIMOTHY J 33d
17972368 TESSELATION-BASED PROXIMITY SYSTEM MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A 41d
19423956 AUTOMATED ACTIONABLE INSIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS MACASIANO, MARILYN G —
19201716 UNIVERSAL STORAGE HANDLER GOLDSCHMIDT, CRAIG S —
19193667 AI-DRIVEN TRAVEL COMPARISON SYSTEM WEINER, ARIELLE E —
18221730 GENERATION AND APPLICATION OF EMBEDDINGS FOR LODGING ITEMS KIM, PATRICK —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18534384 TRAVEL-SPECIFIC NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM VOGT, JACOB BUI 8d overdue
18737796 CENTROID-BASED MACHINE LEARNING ITEM RANKING WITHIN AN EMBEDDING SPACE KANG, TIMOTHY J 33d
17972368 TESSELATION-BASED PROXIMITY SYSTEM MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A 41d
19427417 BOOKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE —
19423956 AUTOMATED ACTIONABLE INSIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS MACASIANO, MARILYN G —
19201716 UNIVERSAL STORAGE HANDLER GOLDSCHMIDT, CRAIG S —
19193667 AI-DRIVEN TRAVEL COMPARISON SYSTEM WEINER, ARIELLE E —
18221730 GENERATION AND APPLICATION OF EMBEDDINGS FOR LODGING ITEMS KIM, PATRICK —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3689 2
3628 2
3699 1
3622 1
2132 1
2653 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19427417 BOOKING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM JONES, COURTNEY PATRICE 3699 DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 19, 2025
19423956 AUTOMATED ACTIONABLE INSIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS MACASIANO, MARILYN G 3622 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2025
19201716 UNIVERSAL STORAGE HANDLER GOLDSCHMIDT, CRAIG S 2132 §103§112Other Final Rejection — Pending May 07, 2025
19193667 AI-DRIVEN TRAVEL COMPARISON SYSTEM WEINER, ARIELLE E 3689 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2025
18737796 CENTROID-BASED MACHINE LEARNING ITEM RANKING WITHIN AN EMBEDDING SPACE KANG, TIMOTHY J 3689 §101§103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Jun 07, 2024
18534384 TRAVEL-SPECIFIC NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM VOGT, JACOB BUI 2653 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Dec 08, 2023
18221730 GENERATION AND APPLICATION OF EMBEDDINGS FOR LODGING ITEMS KIM, PATRICK 3628 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 13, 2023
17972368 TESSELATION-BASED PROXIMITY SYSTEM MANEJWALA, ISMAIL A 3628 §101 Final Rejection 41d Pending Oct 24, 2022

Managing Expedia Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Expedia Inc. have?

Expedia Inc. has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 8 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Expedia Inc. applications?

Courtney Patrice Jones has the most, with 1 of Expedia Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Expedia Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month