Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Expedia Inc.

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Expedia Inc. currently manages 8 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are assigned to 8 distinct examiners, meaning each of the 8 pending actions is being reviewed by a different individual. This distribution indicates a lack of examiner consolidation across the current portfolio. Such a decentralized approach requires the company to navigate 8 different examination styles, which can lead to a diverse range of prosecution outcomes for its e-commerce and mechanical systems filings.

The company's prosecution activity is spread across 6 distinct art units. With 8 pending office actions, the company's work is distributed through 6 different specialized divisions. This presence in 6 art units suggests that the company's e-commerce and mechanical systems filings cover several technical classifications. The ratio of 8 actions to 6 art units indicates that most units are handling only one or two cases, further emphasizing the wide technical reach of the company's current patent portfolio within its primary technology area.

MARILYN G MACASIANO is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. As all 8 distinct examiners are managing exactly 1 action each, the workload is uniform across the 8 pending matters. The management of 8 pending actions in 6 art units reflects the company's ongoing patent efforts. This structure indicates that the company's current portfolio is being reviewed by a varied group of specialists, requiring a comprehensive approach to its intellectual property strategy.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
2
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only2 (29%)
§101 + other3 (43%)
§103 only2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
57% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MACASIANO, MARILYN G 1 57.5% +17.1%
REFAI, SAM M 1 34.9% +7.4%
WEINER, ARIELLE E 1 43.6% +53.3%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 1 45.7% +26.8%
BUNKER, WILLIAM B 1 80.2% +94.9%
VOGT, JACOB BUI 1 44.4% +85.0%
KIM, PATRICK 1 26.3% +33.9%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18658526 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MITIGATING TRAVEL-RELATED TRANSACTION FRAUD RISK USING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL. BUNKER, WILLIAM B —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18737796 CENTROID-BASED MACHINE LEARNING ITEM RANKING WITHIN AN EMBEDDING SPACE KANG, TIMOTHY J 33d
19423956 AUTOMATED ACTIONABLE INSIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS MACASIANO, MARILYN G —
19268819 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING SEMI-OPAQUE SALES WITH ITEM BUNDLES REFAI, SAM M —
19193667 AI-DRIVEN TRAVEL COMPARISON SYSTEM WEINER, ARIELLE E —
18221730 GENERATION AND APPLICATION OF EMBEDDINGS FOR LODGING ITEMS KIM, PATRICK —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18534384 TRAVEL-SPECIFIC NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM VOGT, JACOB BUI 8d overdue
18737796 CENTROID-BASED MACHINE LEARNING ITEM RANKING WITHIN AN EMBEDDING SPACE KANG, TIMOTHY J 33d
19423956 AUTOMATED ACTIONABLE INSIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS MACASIANO, MARILYN G —
19193667 AI-DRIVEN TRAVEL COMPARISON SYSTEM WEINER, ARIELLE E —
18658526 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MITIGATING TRAVEL-RELATED TRANSACTION FRAUD RISK USING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL. BUNKER, WILLIAM B —
18221730 GENERATION AND APPLICATION OF EMBEDDINGS FOR LODGING ITEMS KIM, PATRICK —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3622 1
3689 1
3691 1
2653 1
3628 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19423956 AUTOMATED ACTIONABLE INSIGHT RECOMMENDATIONS MACASIANO, MARILYN G 3622 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 17, 2025
19268819 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONDUCTING SEMI-OPAQUE SALES WITH ITEM BUNDLES REFAI, SAM M — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 14, 2025
19193667 AI-DRIVEN TRAVEL COMPARISON SYSTEM WEINER, ARIELLE E — §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 29, 2025
18737796 CENTROID-BASED MACHINE LEARNING ITEM RANKING WITHIN AN EMBEDDING SPACE KANG, TIMOTHY J 3689 §101§103 Final Rejection 33d Pending Jun 07, 2024
18658526 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MITIGATING TRAVEL-RELATED TRANSACTION FRAUD RISK USING MACHINE LEARNING MODEL. BUNKER, WILLIAM B 3691 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 08, 2024
18534384 TRAVEL-SPECIFIC NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEM VOGT, JACOB BUI 2653 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Dec 08, 2023
18221730 GENERATION AND APPLICATION OF EMBEDDINGS FOR LODGING ITEMS KIM, PATRICK 3628 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 13, 2023

Managing Expedia Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month