Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 16 patents granted in the last 365 days
Experian Information Solutions Inc. currently manages 3 pending office actions within the Computing & Software technology area. These actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that each pending matter is under the review of a different official. LE, MIRANDA is identified as the busiest examiner, currently handling 1 pending office action. This distribution indicates that the company's current patenting efforts are not concentrated under any single examiner's authority, with each of the 3 distinct examiners managing one-third of the workload.
The portfolio's technical breadth is evidenced by its distribution across 3 distinct art units. This suggests that the 3 pending office actions span several specialized sub-fields within Computing & Software. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution strategy must be versatile, as each of the 3 art units may have different internal guidelines. The involvement of 3 distinct examiners provides a variety of perspectives on the company's innovations, mitigating the risk associated with any single examiner's tendencies.
Managing 3 pending office actions across 3 distinct art units requires a coordinated effort to maintain consistency. Since 3 distinct examiners are involved, the company must adapt to a range of examination approaches. The fact that LE, MIRANDA handles 1 pending office action reinforces the need for a broad-based strategy. This diversified examiner and art unit base provides a comprehensive view of how the patent office perceives the company's technology across 3 different technical classifications.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (33%) |
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LE, MIRANDA | 1 | 74.9% | +77.3% |
| JOHNSON, CARLTON | 1 | 58.0% | +33.0% |
| POINVIL, FRANTZY | 1 | 79.0% | +15.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18307738 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PRESENTING SIMULATED CREDIT SCORE INFORMATION | POINVIL, FRANTZY | 31d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18427647 | USER PERMISSIONS FOR ACCESS TO SECURE DATA AT THIRD-PARTY | JOHNSON, CARLTON | 31d overdue |
| 18307738 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PRESENTING SIMULATED CREDIT SCORE INFORMATION | POINVIL, FRANTZY | 31d overdue |
| 18618269 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROSS-PLATFORM BATCH DATA PROCESSING | LE, MIRANDA | 17d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2153 | 1 |
| 2436 | 1 |
| 3693 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18618269 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROSS-PLATFORM BATCH DATA PROCESSING | LE, MIRANDA | 2153 | §103 | Final Rejection | 17d overdue | Pending | Mar 27, 2024 |
| 18427647 | USER PERMISSIONS FOR ACCESS TO SECURE DATA AT THIRD-PARTY | JOHNSON, CARLTON | 2436 | §103 | Final Rejection | 31d overdue | Pending | Jan 30, 2024 |
| 18307738 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PRESENTING SIMULATED CREDIT SCORE INFORMATION | POINVIL, FRANTZY | 3693 | §101 | Final Rejection | 31d overdue | Pending | Apr 26, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial