Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
5 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIPP, AMY R. | 2 | 70.5% | +26.4% |
| SHIRSAT, MARCELA | 2 | 73.2% | +19.8% |
| STEWART, ALVIN J | 1 | 82.4% | +0.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18106811 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CMC SUTURE SUSPENSIONPLASTY | STEWART, ALVIN J | 16d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18629482 | METHODS FOR DRILLING-GUIDEWIRE TARGETING OF CANNULATED DEVICES | SHIRSAT, MARCELA | 28d overdue |
| 17923449 | WRIST FUSION SYSTEM AND DELIVERY TOOL | SHIRSAT, MARCELA | 19d |
| 17448184 | BONE STABILIZATION DEVICE | SIPP, AMY R. | 29d |
| 18733142 | BONE STABILIZATION DEVICE | SIPP, AMY R. | 30d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3775 | 4 |
| 3799 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18733142 | BONE STABILIZATION DEVICE | SIPP, AMY R. | 3775 | §103 | Final Rejection | 30d | Pending | Jun 04, 2024 |
| 18629482 | METHODS FOR DRILLING-GUIDEWIRE TARGETING OF CANNULATED DEVICES | SHIRSAT, MARCELA | 3775 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 28d overdue | Pending | Apr 08, 2024 |
| 18106811 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CMC SUTURE SUSPENSIONPLASTY | STEWART, ALVIN J | 3799 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 16d overdue | Pending | Feb 07, 2023 |
| 17923449 | WRIST FUSION SYSTEM AND DELIVERY TOOL | SHIRSAT, MARCELA | 3775 | §103 | Final Rejection | 19d | Pending | Nov 04, 2022 |
| 17448184 | BONE STABILIZATION DEVICE | SIPP, AMY R. | 3775 | §103 | Final Rejection | 29d | Pending | Sep 20, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial