Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

F5 Inc.

8 pending office actions • 7 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 24 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (25%)
6
Medium (75%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only6 (75%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MCFARLAND-BARNES, KELAH JANAE 1 100.0% +0.0%
WOLDEMARIAM, AYELE F 1 59.5% +55.4%
BECHTEL, KEVIN M 1 70.1% +61.7%
AHMED, MAHABUB S 1 85.5% +8.2%
BARKER, TODD L 1 75.6% +23.3%
TOLENTINO, RODERICK 1 77.6% +35.2%
HUQ, FARZANA B 1 79.9% +30.9%
ASRES, HERMON 1 80.3% +19.0%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18895773 PREVENTING AN UNAUTHORIZED VIRTUAL MACHINE FROM ACCESSING A VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK MCFARLAND-BARNES, KELAH JANAE
18758550 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR ENHANCING SECURITY PROTECTION FOR A NETWORK SERVICE DEVICE AHMED, MAHABUB S
18374466 METHODS FOR CONTROLLING NETWORK TRAFFIC WITH A SUBSCRIBER-AWARE DISAGGREGATOR AND METHODS THEREOF ASRES, HERMON

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18887613 METHODS FOR PROTECTING RESOURCES ACCESSIBLE TO A DEVICE CONNECTED VIA AN AUTHORIZED DEVICE OPERATING AS A HOTSPOT BECHTEL, KEVIN M 24d overdue
18614893 METHODS FOR ALLOCATING A TRAFFIC LOAD AND DEVICES THEREOF BARKER, TODD L

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18393294 METHODS FOR CAPTURING RECONNAISSANCE TRAFFIC TOLENTINO, RODERICK 35d overdue
18887613 METHODS FOR PROTECTING RESOURCES ACCESSIBLE TO A DEVICE CONNECTED VIA AN AUTHORIZED DEVICE OPERATING AS A HOTSPOT BECHTEL, KEVIN M 24d overdue
18375068 METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ROUTING OF A MESSAGE AND DEVICES THEREOF HUQ, FARZANA B 84d
18893662 METHODS FOR PROVIDING SUBSCRIBER AWARE NETWORK TRAFFIC ROUTING IN A 5G CORE NETWORK WOLDEMARIAM, AYELE F
18614893 METHODS FOR ALLOCATING A TRAFFIC LOAD AND DEVICES THEREOF BARKER, TODD L
18374466 METHODS FOR CONTROLLING NETWORK TRAFFIC WITH A SUBSCRIBER-AWARE DISAGGREGATOR AND METHODS THEREOF ASRES, HERMON

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2449 2
2431 1
2447 1
2491 1
2434 1
2439 1
2455 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18895773 PREVENTING AN UNAUTHORIZED VIRTUAL MACHINE FROM ACCESSING A VIRTUAL PRIVATE NETWORK MCFARLAND-BARNES, KELAH JANAE 2431 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 25, 2024
18893662 METHODS FOR PROVIDING SUBSCRIBER AWARE NETWORK TRAFFIC ROUTING IN A 5G CORE NETWORK WOLDEMARIAM, AYELE F 2447 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 23, 2024
18887613 METHODS FOR PROTECTING RESOURCES ACCESSIBLE TO A DEVICE CONNECTED VIA AN AUTHORIZED DEVICE OPERATING AS A HOTSPOT BECHTEL, KEVIN M 2491 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 24d overdue Pending Sep 17, 2024
18758550 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR ENHANCING SECURITY PROTECTION FOR A NETWORK SERVICE DEVICE AHMED, MAHABUB S 2434 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jun 28, 2024
18614893 METHODS FOR ALLOCATING A TRAFFIC LOAD AND DEVICES THEREOF BARKER, TODD L 2449 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 25, 2024
18393294 METHODS FOR CAPTURING RECONNAISSANCE TRAFFIC TOLENTINO, RODERICK 2439 §103 Non-Final OA 35d overdue Pending Dec 21, 2023
18375068 METHODS FOR OPTIMIZING ROUTING OF A MESSAGE AND DEVICES THEREOF HUQ, FARZANA B 2455 §103 Non-Final OA 84d Pending Sep 29, 2023
18374466 METHODS FOR CONTROLLING NETWORK TRAFFIC WITH A SUBSCRIBER-AWARE DISAGGREGATOR AND METHODS THEREOF ASRES, HERMON 2449 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 28, 2023

Managing F5 Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month