Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Fabrum Ip Holdings Limited is currently addressing 1 pending office action within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The company's current patent activity is concentrated in a single administrative and technical niche, suggesting a very specific focus for its pending intellectual property at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MARONEY, JENNA M, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. This accounts for the total of 1 pending office actions currently active for the company. Prosecution strategy is therefore focused on meeting the specific expectations of this 1 examiner within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field, which simplifies the communication process for legal representatives.
With 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner, the administrative burden on the company is low. There are no competing priorities across different departments or examination teams. This streamlined environment allows Fabrum Ip Holdings Limited to dedicate its resources to resolving the 1 pending office action through a single point of contact, ensuring a consistent approach to its patent claims.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARONEY, JENNA M | 1 | 64.5% | +20.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18716711 | CRYOGENIC VESSEL ARRANGEMENT | MARONEY, JENNA M | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18716711 | CRYOGENIC VESSEL ARRANGEMENT | MARONEY, JENNA M | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3763 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18716711 | CRYOGENIC VESSEL ARRANGEMENT | MARONEY, JENNA M | 3763 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 13d | Pending | Jun 05, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial