Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Famppy Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This prosecution is being handled by 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit. This concentration suggests that the company's current patent office activity is focused on a single matter or a narrow set of claims within the Communications field.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N, who is managing the 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate success depends on addressing the specific requirements of OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N. The presence of only 1 distinct art unit means the company does not have to manage the varying procedural standards of multiple units at this time.
With 1 pending office action assigned to OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N, the administrative tracking for Famppy Inc. is straightforward. OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N, as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, represents the entirety of the company's current pending workload. This profile, featuring 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicates a highly focused prosecution state for the 1 pending office action currently on file.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 1 | 81.8% | +10.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18218847 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING CONTENT USING USER SENTENCES | OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 46d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18218847 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING CONTENT USING USER SENTENCES | OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 46d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2658 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18218847 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING CONTENT USING USER SENTENCES | OPSASNICK, MICHAEL N | 2658 | §103 | Final Rejection | 46d overdue | Pending | Jul 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial