Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Faradion Limited has 3 pending office actions focused in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, ensuring that no single examiner is handling more than one of the company's active cases. This distribution provides a variety of examiner perspectives across the pending portfolio, which can be beneficial for navigating different interpretations of the prior art. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution strategy must be adapted to the specific tendencies of three different examiners.
The prosecution is spread across 2 distinct art units, indicating some level of technical overlap or relatedness in the subject matter. KIM, ANDREW NATHANIEL is the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action, representing a balanced distribution of the workload across the assigned staff. For the applicant, this means that while the technology area is unified, the prosecution strategy must be adapted to two different administrative units and three different examiners, preventing a single point of failure in the patenting process. This structure suggests a focused yet technically diverse approach to chemical innovation.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, ANDREW NATHANIEL | 1 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| BICKIYA, AIMAN AMIR | 1 | 42.3% | +53.9% |
| ARCIERO, ADAM A | 1 | 65.2% | -17.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18701766 | CARBON ANODE MATERIALS | KIM, ANDREW NATHANIEL | — |
| 18291398 | SODIUM-ION CELLS | BICKIYA, AIMAN AMIR | — |
| 17413046 | SODIUM-ION BATTERIES | ARCIERO, ADAM A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18291398 | SODIUM-ION CELLS | BICKIYA, AIMAN AMIR | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1727 | 2 |
| 2859 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18701766 | CARBON ANODE MATERIALS | KIM, ANDREW NATHANIEL | 1727 | §102§103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 16, 2024 |
| 18291398 | SODIUM-ION CELLS | BICKIYA, AIMAN AMIR | 2859 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 23, 2024 |
| 17413046 | SODIUM-ION BATTERIES | ARCIERO, ADAM A | 1727 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 11, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialFaradion Limited has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 3 examiners.
Andrew Nathaniel Kim has the most, with 1 of Faradion Limited's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
