Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Fast Ip Hb has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, Noah Chandler Hawk, who is currently the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution activity is situated within 1 distinct art unit.
The presence of 1 pending office action indicates a very narrow and specific engagement with the patent office. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's immediate prosecution success is entirely dependent on the evaluation of Noah Chandler Hawk. This concentration means there is no other active data to compare against this examiner's interpretation of the technology involved.
Practitioners managing this portfolio must focus on the specific requirements of the pending office action. The 1 distinct art unit suggests the filing is classified within a specific technical category of the broader transportation and mechanical systems field. With a busiest examiner pending count of 1, the current workload is at its most concentrated level, requiring a targeted approach to this official.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 1 | 61.4% | +22.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18840004 | DEVICE FOR LENGTH REGULATION OF POLES | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3636 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18840004 | DEVICE FOR LENGTH REGULATION OF POLES | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 3636 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial