Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Fbgs International NV currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner, indicating that the organization's current patent activity is concentrated within a single administrative and technical review group at the patent office. For the applicant, this concentration means that the prosecution strategy does not need to account for varying standards across different art units or examiner groups.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since this examiner is the only one assigned to the current pending workload, their individual review tendencies and interpretation of the prior art will be the primary factors in the prosecution outcome. Practitioners should review the examiner's history in the Chemistry & Materials field to prepare for the specific requirements of this pending matter. Understanding the examiner's typical approach to claim rejections or evidence requirements in this specific technology area can help in formulating a more effective response to the pending office action.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S | 1 | 62.3% | +10.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17888840 | DRAW TOWER GRATING PRODUCTION METHOD AND SYSTEM | DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17888840 | DRAW TOWER GRATING PRODUCTION METHOD AND SYSTEM | DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1700 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17888840 | DRAW TOWER GRATING PRODUCTION METHOD AND SYSTEM | DEHGHAN, QUEENIE S | 1700 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 16, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial