Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 13 patents granted in the last 365 days
Feitian Technologies Co., Ltd. maintains a portfolio with 2 pending office actions focused in the Networking & Security technology area. These active matters are spread across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. Such a distribution suggests that the company's intellectual property interests in Networking & Security are being evaluated by multiple specialized groups within the patent office. This variety in assignment requires a strategy that accounts for different examiner behaviors.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is AMBAYE, SAMUEL, who is currently handling 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because there are 2 pending office actions in total, the workload is shared across the 2 distinct examiners. Navigating 2 distinct art units requires attention to the specific examination standards of each group. The 2 distinct examiners involved indicate that no single person is responsible for all pending matters. With 2 pending office actions, the company's current prosecution is divided among the assigned examiners.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMBAYE, SAMUEL | 1 | 82.4% | +25.1% |
| DAVIS, ZACHARY A | 1 | 53.4% | +21.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18995876 | IMPLEMENTATION METHOD FOR SECURITY DEVICE AND SECURITY DEVICE | AMBAYE, SAMUEL | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17611438 | METHOD FOR DETECTING TERMINAL FOR ANTI-TAMPER AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | DAVIS, ZACHARY A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18995876 | IMPLEMENTATION METHOD FOR SECURITY DEVICE AND SECURITY DEVICE | AMBAYE, SAMUEL | — |
| 17611438 | METHOD FOR DETECTING TERMINAL FOR ANTI-TAMPER AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | DAVIS, ZACHARY A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2433 | 1 |
| 2492 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18995876 | IMPLEMENTATION METHOD FOR SECURITY DEVICE AND SECURITY DEVICE | AMBAYE, SAMUEL | 2433 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 17, 2025 |
| 17611438 | METHOD FOR DETECTING TERMINAL FOR ANTI-TAMPER AND APPARATUS THEREFOR | DAVIS, ZACHARY A | 2492 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 15, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial