Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Fenix Group S R L

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Fenix Group S R L is currently managing 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. Both of these actions are assigned to 1 distinct examiner and are located within 1 distinct art unit. This represents a highly concentrated prosecution profile where all active matters are being reviewed by the same individual in the same administrative group.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is REDDY, SUNITA, who is responsible for 2 pending office actions. Since this examiner handles the entirety of the company's pending workload, the relationship with this individual is the single most important factor in the current prosecution cycle. Practitioners can benefit from this concentration by developing a consistent dialogue and a unified technical narrative across both cases.

The alignment of 2 pending office actions with 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit simplifies the administrative oversight required. There is no need to reconcile different examiner styles or varying art unit policies. Success for the current prosecution efforts depends on the effective resolution of the 2 pending office actions currently under the review of REDDY, SUNITA.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
0
Medium (0%)
1
Easy (50%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
REDDY, SUNITA 2 67.4% +61.2%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18721080 KIT FOR IMPROVING THE DISTURBANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE INFLAMMATION OF ADIPOSE TISSUE, WITH THE PHLEBOLYMPHATIC PATHOLOGIES AND FOR MUSCULAR REHABILITATION IN GENERAL REDDY, SUNITA —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18721080 KIT FOR IMPROVING THE DISTURBANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE INFLAMMATION OF ADIPOSE TISSUE, WITH THE PHLEBOLYMPHATIC PATHOLOGIES AND FOR MUSCULAR REHABILITATION IN GENERAL REDDY, SUNITA —
18721098 MAGNETOTHERAPY AND COMPRESSIVE MICROVIBRATION APPARATUS FOR THE TISSUES REDDY, SUNITA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3791 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18721080 KIT FOR IMPROVING THE DISTURBANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THE INFLAMMATION OF ADIPOSE TISSUE, WITH THE PHLEBOLYMPHATIC PATHOLOGIES AND FOR MUSCULAR REHABILITATION IN GENERAL REDDY, SUNITA 3791 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2024
18721098 MAGNETOTHERAPY AND COMPRESSIVE MICROVIBRATION APPARATUS FOR THE TISSUES REDDY, SUNITA 3791 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2024

Managing Fenix Group S R L's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Fenix Group S R L have?

Fenix Group S R L has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Fenix Group S R L applications?

Sunita Reddy has the most, with 2 of Fenix Group S R L's pending office actions.

What technology area are Fenix Group S R L's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month