Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Fermata Energy Ii LLC

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Fermata Energy Ii LLC has 2 pending office actions in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio involves 2 distinct examiners working across 2 distinct art units. This structure shows a direct ratio between pending actions and examiners. With 2 distinct art units involved, the prosecution is not centralized in a single administrative group. This distribution suggests that the company is pursuing different technical paths within the semiconductor sector. The administrative path is defined by these 2 separate units, which affects prosecution timelines and strategy.

DAVID P TARDIF is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners and 2 pending office actions, the prosecution effort is divided equally. For the applicant, this means that understanding the specific tendencies of the assigned examiners is a factor for success. The limited scope of 1 pending office action per examiner simplifies the management of the current portfolio. This decentralized approach ensures that feedback is gathered from different professional perspectives within the 2 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
100% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TARDIF, DAVID P 1 72.0% +10.2%
TORRES RUIZ, JOHALI ALEJANDRA 1 54.5% +23.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18244067 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF DISPATCH SCHEDULES FOR DISCHARGING AND CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FOR USE IN VEHICLE-TO-GRID ACTIVITIES TARDIF, DAVID P —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18244067 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF DISPATCH SCHEDULES FOR DISCHARGING AND CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FOR USE IN VEHICLE-TO-GRID ACTIVITIES TARDIF, DAVID P —
17500449 METHODS OF USING BIDIRECTIONAL CHARGING TO SUPPLY BACK-UP POWER AND INCREASE RESILIENCY OF POWERED NETWORKS TORRES RUIZ, JOHALI ALEJANDRA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2876 1
2859 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18244067 DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR OPTIMIZATION OF DISPATCH SCHEDULES FOR DISCHARGING AND CHARGING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLES FOR USE IN VEHICLE-TO-GRID ACTIVITIES TARDIF, DAVID P 2876 §101§102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 08, 2023
17500449 METHODS OF USING BIDIRECTIONAL CHARGING TO SUPPLY BACK-UP POWER AND INCREASE RESILIENCY OF POWERED NETWORKS TORRES RUIZ, JOHALI ALEJANDRA 2859 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 13, 2021

Managing Fermata Energy Ii LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Fermata Energy Ii LLC have?

Fermata Energy Ii LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Fermata Energy Ii LLC applications?

David P Tardif has the most, with 1 of Fermata Energy Ii LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Fermata Energy Ii LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics (USPTO Tech Center 2800), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month